NVIDIA GRID A100A vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 1638GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1700MHz vs 1005MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 48GB)
Lower TDP (300W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100A
13.89 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+62%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Dec 2021
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
64GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
6144bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
6656
432
TMUs
416
192
ROPs
0
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
300W
800 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
N/A
