NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
5248 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100A
+439%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000
2.573 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Jun 2015
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
1664
432
TMUs
104
192
ROPs
64
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.47 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.39 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.573 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
80.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
120W
800 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-850-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4
