Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +4160%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Aug 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
192
432
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
8
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

400W
TDP
35W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy