NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
6864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100A
+10837%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Aug 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
6
6912
Shading Units
48
432
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
16
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
400W
TDP
65W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
