Intel GMA X4500 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel GMA X4500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GMA X4500
0.085 TFLOPS
Iris Plus Graphics 640
+894%
0.845 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2017
GMA Graphics
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
384
10
TMUs
48
1
ROPs
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
533.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
5.330 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.690 TFLOPS
85.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
844.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Eaglelake
GPU Name
Kaby Lake GT3e
-
-
-
Generation 5.0
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm++
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
