Intel GMA X4500 vs Intel GMA 3100
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel GMA X4500 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2007
GMA Graphics
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
-
10
TMUs
4
1
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
533.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
5.330 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
85.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
13W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Eaglelake
GPU Name
Bearlake
-
GPU Variant
Bearlake-G+ (G33)
Generation 5.0
Architecture
Generation 4.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
90 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.0
DirectX
9.0c
2.0
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0
