Intel GMA X4500 vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500 and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel GMA X4500 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (13W vs 23W)
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GMA X4500
0.085 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
+7%
0.091 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2010
GMA Graphics
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
80
Shading Units
48
10
TMUs
16
1
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
533.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
5.330 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
85.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
13W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Eaglelake
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
Generation 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
