Intel GMA X3500 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel GMA X3500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2017
GMA Graphics
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
48
1
ROPs
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
667.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.900 GPixel/s
5.336 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.766 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
883.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
220.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Bearlake
GPU Name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Bearlake (G35)
GPU Variant
-
Generation 4.0
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
90 nm
Process Size
14 nm++
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4
