Intel GMA 3100 vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3100 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel GMA 3100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 35W)
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2025
GMA Graphics
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Bearlake
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Bearlake-G+ (G33)
GPU Variant
-
Generation 4.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
