NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 19 years late
Boost Clock2572MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 180W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2025
Release Date
Apr 2006
GeForce 50
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2407 MHz
Base Clock
-
2572 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR7
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
123.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
370.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
23.70 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.70 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
370.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
180W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GB206
GPU Name
NV43
GB206-300-A1
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
110 nm
21.9 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
181 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
12.0
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
