NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
12288 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090
+430%
82.58 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 40
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.01TB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
128
SM Count
-
16384
Shading Units
4096
512
TMUs
256
176
ROPs
256
512
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
443.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
1290 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
82.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
82.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
1290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
250W
850 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
AD102-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
22 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
