Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16344 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 +257962%
82.58 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1008GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

128
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
16384
Shading Units
40
512
TMUs
4
176
ROPs
4
512
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

443.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
1290 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
82.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
82.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
1290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
RV620
AD102-300-A1
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

450W
TDP
32W
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy