NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Ti and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2565MHz vs 2130MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
+677%
93.24 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 40
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2325 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
2565 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
142
SM Count
22
18176
Shading Units
2816
568
TMUs
88
192
ROPs
48
568
Tensor Cores
88
142
RT Cores
22
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
492.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
1457 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
93.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
93.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
1457 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
70W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
AD107
AD102-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
