NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Ti and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock2565MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
+775%
93.24 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 40
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2325 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
2565 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
4096
568
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
256
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
492.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
1457 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
93.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
93.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
1457 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
150W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
AD102-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
