NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Ti and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock2565MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
18056 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
+64650%
93.24 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2325 MHz
Base Clock
-
2565 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
120
568
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
492.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
1457 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
93.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
93.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
1457 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
600W
TDP
73W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV630
AD102-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
