NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (1695MHz vs 1021MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 100.4GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
+2003%
32.98 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition
1.568 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1335 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
1021 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1568 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
100.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
768
304
TMUs
48
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
189.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.34 GPixel/s
515.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
49.01 GTexel/s
32.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.98 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.568 TFLOPS
515.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Strato
GN21-X11
GPU Variant
Strato PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
