Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile +1392%
32.98 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
2.209 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Oct 2012
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1335 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

76
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
9728
Shading Units
1536
304
TMUs
128
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

189.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.01 GPixel/s
515.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.03 GTexel/s
32.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.98 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.209 TFLOPS
515.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.03 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
GK104
GN21-X11
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX2-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

120W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy