NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 Ti and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (678.4GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 400W)
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2005
GeForce 40
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1325 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
678.4GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
110
SM Count
-
14080
Shading Units
-
440
TMUs
12
144
ROPs
8
440
Tensor Cores
-
110
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
80 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
375.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
1148 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
73.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
73.50 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1148 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
400W
TDP
83W
800 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
NV41
AD102-225-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
