NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 Ti and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (678.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
13280 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
+7250%
73.5 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1325 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
678.4GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
110
SM Count
-
14080
Shading Units
800
440
TMUs
40
144
ROPs
16
440
Tensor Cores
-
110
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
375.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
1148 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
73.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
73.50 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
1148 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
150W
800 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV770
AD102-225-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
