NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 Ti and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (678.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
13568 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
+11870%
73.5 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1325 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
678.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
110
SM Count
-
14080
Shading Units
512
440
TMUs
32
144
ROPs
32
440
Tensor Cores
-
110
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
80 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
375.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
1148 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
73.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
73.50 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
1148 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
75W
800 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cayman
AD102-225-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
