NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
10128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
+19312%
52.22 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2024
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2295 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1438 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
736.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
80
SM Count
14
10240
Shading Units
112
320
TMUs
28
112
ROPs
20
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
285.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
816.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
52.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
816.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
320W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
G80
AD103-400-A1
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.0
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
