NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
9440 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
+4251%
52.22 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2024
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2295 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1438 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
736.3GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
80
SM Count
-
10240
Shading Units
800
320
TMUs
40
112
ROPs
16
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
285.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
816.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
52.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
816.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
320W
TDP
160W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
RV770
AD103-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
