Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +8404%
52.22 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2295 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1438 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
736.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
10240
Shading Units
512
320
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
32
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

285.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
816.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
52.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
816.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Cayman
AD103-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

320W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy