NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (2505MHz vs 1350MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
+683%
48.74 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5700
6.221 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
2304
304
TMUs
144
112
ROPs
64
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
194.4 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.44 TFLOPS
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.221 TFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
388.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
320W
TDP
130W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Navi 10
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XLA
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
7 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
