Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs AMD FirePro S9170

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (275W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB +830%
48.74 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Jul 2015
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

76
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
9728
Shading Units
2816
304
TMUs
176
112
ROPs
64
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Hawaii
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

320W
TDP
275W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy