Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
3072 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (220W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 504.2GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER +344%
35.48 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1980 MHz
Base Clock
-
2475 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
504.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
7168
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
80
ROPs
64
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

198.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
554.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
35.48 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
35.48 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
554.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Capsaicin
AD104-350-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

220W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy