Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti +176%
22.06 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2023
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

32
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
4352
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
324.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD106
GPU Name
Capsaicin
AD106-350-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.9 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy