NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (2010MHz vs 1890MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
11.61 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+6%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1545 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1890 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
24
3072
Shading Units
3072
96
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
48
96
Tensor Cores
96
24
RT Cores
24
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
90.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
181.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
11.61 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
11.61 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
181.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
AD107
GN21-X4
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
