Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 100W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

18
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV530
-
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
41W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy