Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (2640MHz vs 2320MHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050
13.52 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +31%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
2075 MHz
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

18
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
60
2560
Shading Units
3840
80
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
60
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
32 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy