NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2520 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050
+42150%
13.52 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
115W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
