NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1755MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
+2240%
8.986 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1455 MHz
Base Clock
-
1755 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
84.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
140.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
8.986 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.986 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
140.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV730
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
