Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W6170M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W6170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1755MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile +355%
8.986 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1455 MHz
Base Clock
-
1755 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
140.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
8.986 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.986 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
140.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Emerald
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net