Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs ATI Radeon X1650

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3090 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (936.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
10496 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2020
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 30
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1219 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
936.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

82
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
10496
Shading Units
-
328
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
328
Tensor Cores
-
82
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

189.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
556.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
35.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
35.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
556.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
RV516
GA102-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
90 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
Unknown
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy