NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
5344 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 290W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
+2075%
21.75 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1188 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
608.3GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
800
192
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
339.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
21.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
21.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
339.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
290W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
RV770
GA104-401-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
