Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (2010MHz vs 1492MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
6.111 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+102%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 30 Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1237 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1492 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
96
16
RT Cores
24
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
47.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
95.49 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
6.111 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
6.111 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
95.49 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
