Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock990MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh +955%
4.055 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 30 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

622 MHz
Base Clock
-
990 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
63.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
4.055 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.055 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
63.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.514 billion
Unknown
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net