Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
6.774 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +17%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 30
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1042 MHz
Base Clock
-
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
96bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

18
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
2304
Shading Units
4096
72
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

47.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
105.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
6.774 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.774 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Capsaicin
GA107-325-K2-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy