NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Lower TDP (215W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2100MHz vs 1710MHz)
More VRAM (288GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
16512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080
10.07 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+711%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2018
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 20
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1515 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
46
SM Count
-
2944
Shading Units
19456
184
TMUs
1216
64
ROPs
0
368
Tensor Cores
1216
46
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
109.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
314.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
20.14 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
10.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
314.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
215W
TDP
1000W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
TU104-400A-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
153 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
