NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 215W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080
+2132%
10.07 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
0.451 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2018
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 20
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1515 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
3
2944
Shading Units
144
184
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
368
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
109.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
314.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
20.14 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
314.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS
Board Design
215W
TDP
106W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GF116
TU104-400A-A1
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
