NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 215W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080
+1540%
10.07 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2018
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 20
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1515 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
46
SM Count
-
2944
Shading Units
512
184
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
368
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
109.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
314.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
20.14 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
314.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
215W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
Cayman
TU104-400A-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
