NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (495.9GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
+2143%
11.15 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 20
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1650 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
495.9GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
320
192
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
105W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
RV670
TU104-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
