Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile +2396%
9.585 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
320
192
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

99.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
RV730
N18E-G3
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net