NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1620MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2070
+308%
7.465 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2018
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 20
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
103.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
233.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
14.93 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.465 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
233.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GM206
TU106-400A-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
