NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2070
+646%
7.465 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2018
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 20
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
800
144
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
103.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
233.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
14.93 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.465 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
233.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
RV770
TU106-400A-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
