NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 160W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2019
Release Date
Jul 2005
GeForce 20
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
-
120
TMUs
12
48
ROPs
8
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
201.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
12.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.451 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
201.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
83W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
NV41
TU106-200A-KA-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
