Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs ATI FirePro V7900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2060 +247%
6.451 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2019
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 20
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
1920
Shading Units
1280
120
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

80.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
201.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
12.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.451 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
201.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Cayman
TU106-200A-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy