Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (160W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 +27%
6.451 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 20
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
1920
Shading Units
2816
120
TMUs
176
48
ROPs
64
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

80.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
201.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
12.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.451 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
201.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
Hawaii
TU104-150-KC-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy