NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
+784%
6.659 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 755M
0.753 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Jun 2013
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
34
SM Count
-
2176
Shading Units
384
136
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
272
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
97.92 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
208.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.36 GTexel/s
13.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.659 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
208.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GK107
TU106-410-A1
GPU Variant
GT 755M
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
