NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (2010MHz vs 1477MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
6.05 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+104%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1185 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
96
32
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
